Juan T. on LinkedIn: Judge rules that Google ‘is a monopolist’ in US antitrust case (2024)

Juan T.

  • Report this post

The Number One Search Engine is Google and the Number Two Search Engine is YouTube (owned by Google) but kids today are using AI tools like ChatGPT, Gemini(Owned by Google), Microsoft Co-pilot, Perplexity,So I believe that how we search for information is going to change anyway.

Judge rules that Google ‘is a monopolist’ in US antitrust case theverge.com

5

Like Comment

To view or add a comment, sign in

More Relevant Posts

  • Fred Franks

    • Report this post

    With the rise of generative AI in search, I'm pondering the implications for Google. Over the past 15+ years, Google has dominated the search market (>90%), but the landscape is rapidly evolving with search moving towards AI chatbots beyond Google. This shift raises questions about how it will impact Google's enterprise platform and other services. #AI #Google #SearchIndustry

    Judge rules that Google ‘is a monopolist’ in US antitrust case theverge.com

    7

    Like Comment

    To view or add a comment, sign in

  • Erich Herbert

    Marketing Strategist & Business Development Leader at Gannett | USA TODAY NETWORK

    Regardless of the which side of the coin your on, this ruling will undoubtedly create massive changes in #SearchMarketing. Should Google be broken up, similar to the break up of AT&T in the 80's, marketers need to be prepare for new innovations and capabilities to integrate into search capabilities. Expect #AI to speed up integration and new capabilities coming to market. We're undoubtedly in interesting times as #marketers.

    How Google's huge defeat in antitrust case could change how you search the internet usatoday.com
    Like Comment

    To view or add a comment, sign in

  • Michael Kwamena-Poh jr

    Senior Sales Manager at MainOne, an Equinix Company

    • Report this post

    Google’s Search Antitrust Case Is Also About the Future of AI https://lnkd.in/eQqeJSHmExtracts The most noteworthy testimony so far came from Microsoft Corp. Chief Executive Officer Satya Nadella. Called to the witness stand Oct. 2, he told a tale of futility with Bing. After $100 billion in investment, no amount of negotiation would get Apple Inc. to make Bing the default search engine on the iPhone, Nadella said, noting that hardly anyone changes the defaults. “It would be a big game-changer.”Microsoft is intimately familiar with the implications of antitrust, but its own experience also shows how fast fortunes can change in technology. A key question is whether Google’s current advantage will give it a leg up in the AI market, which could be as big a moneymaker as search — if not bigger.The two areas have some overlap. Many AI systems are trained on vast amounts of information scrounged from the web. From that dog pile they mimic human language to mold a plausible answer to a question and engage in conversation. A good search engine can offer some of the building blocks for a good AI product.Nadella said he worries about a rival locking up information for its AI. Instead of paying to be a phone’s default, Google could, say, pay Wikipedia for exclusive access to its content. “We’re beginning to see some dynamics which are troubling,” Nadella said.But it’s tough to make an antitrust case based on what-ifs. Other testimony focused on how the default setting guides people’s choices today and how it handicaps rivals. Sridhar Ramaswamy, a former head of Google’s ad business, co-founded a competing search startup called Neeva Inc. He said he thought a subscription search engine might fly, but that an economic slowdown and Google’s paid-for placement on smartphones spelled doom for the company.Google lawyers have tried to punch holes in the default-is-king argument. Under questioning, Nadella conceded that even after Bing won default status on mobile devices from Verizon Communications Inc. and other companies, most users still went to Google.The point is crucial because the Justice Department has accused Google of unlawfully maintaining a monopoly by paying $10 billion a year to phone makers and wireless carriers to maintain its default position.Even before the trial, Google claimed it’s the choice for most users of Windows computers, where Bing comes installed as the first option, said David Olson, an associate professor who teaches antitrust at Boston College Law School. “That goes to the argument that defaults don’t really matter,” Olson said. “People are picking the superior product.”

    Google’s Search Antitrust Case Is Also About the Future of AI bloomberg.com
    Like Comment

    To view or add a comment, sign in

  • R Street Institute

    6,405 followers

    • Report this post

    Even the basic assertion that Google possesses a monopoly on search is no longer a slam-dunk case in light of the evolution of digital markets in the past decade. Internet users—younger users in particular—increasingly usesocial media platformsto search the internet. Generative artificial intelligence, such as ChatGPT, representsanother threatto traditional search, especially as it integrates with rival search engines like Bing. And retail rivals like Amazonhave dominatedGoogle in product searches for many years now. Josh Withrow #ai #artificialintelligence #techpolicy #google #publicpolicy

    Breaking Down the DOJ's Anti-Consumer Case Against Google - R Street Institute rstreet.org
    Like Comment

    To view or add a comment, sign in

  • Devin Seiger

    Bachelor's in Political ScienceMinor in Communications

    This is a good write up on the current on going case between the DoJ and Google. It will be interesting to see what direction technology and governance is going to go in the next few years, especially with AI at the forefront.

    DoJ’s Google Case Still Searching for Evidence of Consumer Harm https://www.project-disco.org
    Like Comment

    To view or add a comment, sign in

  • Structure Hire

    1,344 followers

    • Report this post

    Google's Antitrust Battle: What's at StakeGoogle, the internet's search giant, is in the midst of a high-stakes antitrust showdown. Here's the essence of what's on the line:Monopoly Concerns: Regulators are concerned about Google's dominance in search and advertising, which could stifle competition and harm smaller businesses.Potential Consequences: If found guilty, Google may face fines, altered business practices, or even a breakup. This could reshape the tech industry.Impact on Users: Changes could lead to more competition, better services, and improved data privacy for internet users.Broader Implications: This case sets a precedent for future actions against tech giants, influencing the digital landscape we navigate daily.In short, this antitrust battle has far-reaching implications, shaping the future of the internet as we know it.#googleads #googleanalytics

    1

    Like Comment

    To view or add a comment, sign in

  • Stewart Jeffries

    President, Jeffries Strategies LLC

    • Report this post

    It's going to take a while to parse a 277-page opinion.But the quickest take is that it didn't require new antitrust laws or Digital Markets Act style regulation for DOJ to bring this case.Of course, in the time it took to file this case, litigate it, and reach a decision on liability (but not yet remedies - that will be a whole separate phase of the trial) - OpenAI, which has been funded to the tune of billions of dollars by Microsoft - has managed to launch an entirely new way to search and interact with information - ChatGPT.In June, Apple announced that it will be partnering with OpenAI to power its Apple Intelligence product. And less than two weeks ago, OpenAI announced SearchGPT.A few months ago, I had jury duty at the federal courthouse in DC, where Judge Mehta sits. I was struck by the fact that there were displays in the halls of the courthouse on the Microsoft and AT&T cases. There is a clear sense of "making history" around antitrust cases in that particular building, and the early headlines around this case suggest that DOJ feels like they made some today.This case, and the law that is ultimately made once it works its way through appeals process, may indeed be historic.But it's hard not to look at the technological changes well underway and think that they will make an even bigger impact.Google Violated Antitrust Laws in Online Search, Judge Rules https://lnkd.in/eVzCmzij

    ‘Google Is a Monopolist,’ Judge Rules in Landmark Antitrust Case https://www.nytimes.com

    15

    1 Comment

    Like Comment

    To view or add a comment, sign in

  • Charles A. Dyer

    4X Founder | Tech Visionary | Strategic Advisor | Investor

    • Report this post

    🤔 What Google's Legal Loss Means for AI and InnovationThe tech world is buzzing with the recent landmark ruling against Google. In my latest article, I dive deep into how this antitrust ruling could reshape the landscape for AI development, foster innovation, and create new opportunities for emerging players.From potential shifts in search engine AI to the democratization of digital advertising, the ripple effects of this decision are far-reaching. I explore how increased competition might accelerate AI advancements and what it means for privacy, data protection, and the future of online services.Curious about how this ruling might impact your work in tech or AI? Read my full analysis here: https://lnkd.in/eepRPSi6I'm eager to hear your thoughts. How do you think this decision will affect innovation in our industry? Share your perspective in the comments!#TechIndustry #AIInnovation #GoogleAntitrust #DigitalFuture #TechRegulation #AIDevelopment #SearchEngineEvolution #CompetitiveInnovation

    What Google's Legal Loss Means for AI and Innovation - ShyftLogic. https://www.shyftlogic.com

    1

    Like Comment

    To view or add a comment, sign in

  • ShyftLogic.

    1 follower

    • Report this post

    🤔 What Google's Legal Loss Means for AI and InnovationThe tech world is buzzing with the recent landmark ruling against Google. In my latest article, I dive deep into how this antitrust ruling could reshape the landscape for AI development, foster innovation, and create new opportunities for emerging players.From potential shifts in search engine AI to the democratization of digital advertising, the ripple effects of this decision are far-reaching. I explore how increased competition might accelerate AI advancements and what it means for privacy, data protection, and the future of online services.Curious about how this ruling might impact your work in tech or AI? Read my full analysis here: https://lnkd.in/ewVw3JM3I'm eager to hear your thoughts. How do you think this decision will affect innovation in our industry? Share your perspective in the comments!#TechIndustry #AIInnovation #GoogleAntitrust #DigitalFuture #TechRegulation #AIDevelopment #SearchEngineEvolution #CompetitiveInnovation

    What Google's Legal Loss Means for AI and Innovation - ShyftLogic. https://www.shyftlogic.com
    Like Comment

    To view or add a comment, sign in

Juan T. on LinkedIn: Judge rules that Google ‘is a monopolist’ in US antitrust case (27)

Juan T. on LinkedIn: Judge rules that Google ‘is a monopolist’ in US antitrust case (28)

915 followers

  • 1,669 Posts
  • 1 Article

View Profile

Follow

More from this author

  • Open Signal will help you make a Decision as to what Wireless Carrier You should go with. Juan T. 8y

Explore topics

  • Sales
  • Marketing
  • Business Administration
  • HR Management
  • Content Management
  • Engineering
  • Soft Skills
  • See All
Juan T. on LinkedIn: Judge rules that Google ‘is a monopolist’ in US antitrust case (2024)

FAQs

Can Google be considered a monopolist? ›

A US judge ruled that Google built an illegal monopoly. What happens next? A justice department spokesperson said it was evaluating the court's decision and would assess the appropriate next steps consistent with the court's direction and the applicable legal framework for antitrust remedies.

What government regulations were applied to the Google monopoly? ›

In U.S. v. Google, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) and 38 state and territory attorneys general allege that Google has violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act, an antitrust law originally enacted in 1890. The Sherman Act prohibits using exclusionary practices to maintain a monopoly.

What law did Google break? ›

Google was found last week to have violated antitrust law by illegally maintaining a monopoly in internet search.

Is it illegal to be a monopoly under US antitrust law? ›

Other agreements such as exclusive contracts that reduce competition may also violate the Sherman Antitrust Act and are subject to civil enforcement. The Sherman Act also makes it illegal to monopolize, conspire to monopolize, or attempt to monopolize a market for products or services.

Why isn't Google considered a monopoly? ›

Google doesn't have an advertising monopoly. Facebook all by itself does about half of Google's revenue in ads. Then you have twitter, amazon, snap, all kinds of stuff. Google would be lucky to have 40% of online ads, and then once you include all advertising they are way down, maybe 15-20% or something.

How is Google an example of a monopoly? ›

Being the default search engine gives Google access to more data than its rivals, allowing it to improve its algorithms and results and making it even harder for competitors to attract users.

How does Google violate antitrust laws? ›

WASHINGTON, Aug 5 (Reuters) - A U.S. judge ruled on Monday that Google violated antitrust law, spending billions of dollars to create an illegal monopoly and become the world's default search engine, the first big win for federal authorities taking on Big Tech's market dominance.

What lawsuit did Google lose? ›

Google has lost a major anti-trust lawsuit brought by the Department of Justice. The judge ruled that google illegally abused its monopoly power to ensure it dominated the search engine market.

What is the justice department claiming that Google has that is illegal? ›

Google lost its landmark antitrust case against the US Department of Justice this week after a federal judge ruled the tech giant had built an illegal monopoly over the online search and advertising industry.

What are the big 3 antitrust laws? ›

The Big Three Antitrust Laws

Let's take a brief look at the main antitrust laws in the United States. The core of U.S. antitrust legislation was created by three pieces of legislation: the Sherman Anti-Trust Act of 1890, the Federal Trade Commission Act—which also created the FTC—and the Clayton Antitrust Act.

How to prove monopoly power? ›

Courts look at the firm's market share, but typically do not find monopoly power if the firm (or a group of firms acting in concert) has less than 50 percent of the sales of a particular product or service within a certain geographic area. Some courts have required much higher percentages.

Do antitrust laws break up monopolies? ›

The Sherman Antitrust Act is a landmark U.S. law, passed in 1890, which outlawed trusts, monopolies, and cartels to increase economic competitiveness. Monopoly meaning: A market structure with a single seller that prevents viable competition from providing the same product. Learn more about the meaning of monopoly.

Is Google acting like a monopoly? ›

This week, federal district court judge Amit Mehta delivered a landmark decision finding that Google holds an illegal monopoly over the search market, in violation of the Sherman Act. It's a massive victory for the Department of Justice's multiyear legal battle in the first major monopolization trial in over 25 years.

Is Google Play a monopoly? ›

In addition, the jury found Google maintained a monopoly through Android's in-app billing system. The ruling could force Google to change its app store rules, which has helped the Play Store become the dominant Android app provider and a major money-maker.

Are internet companies a monopoly? ›

Monopolies rule the internet. Alphabet owns search; Amazon runs e-commerce; Apple has the hardware; Meta controls social networking; and Microsoft dominates business software. The mantra of modern industry is monopoly, and the internet is one of its victims.

Is Microsoft a monopolist? ›

In the FTC's definition of monopolization, Microsoft is the only company and case cited by name. Ironically, Microsoft has grown even more since that case.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Delena Feil

Last Updated:

Views: 5750

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (45 voted)

Reviews: 92% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Delena Feil

Birthday: 1998-08-29

Address: 747 Lubowitz Run, Sidmouth, HI 90646-5543

Phone: +99513241752844

Job: Design Supervisor

Hobby: Digital arts, Lacemaking, Air sports, Running, Scouting, Shooting, Puzzles

Introduction: My name is Delena Feil, I am a clean, splendid, calm, fancy, jolly, bright, faithful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.