Page 7 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page |
FlyerTalk Forums(https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/index.php)
- United Airlines | MileagePlus(https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus-681/)
- - USA to Canada to USA Cabotage situations / booking / issues(https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-airlines-mileageplus/2117200-usa-canada-usa-cabotage-situations-booking-issues.html)
fumje | Oct 24, 2023 9:59 am |
Originally Posted by jsloan(Post 35690325)
What's an "invalid booking," though?
I suspect the response would be, "tough cookies, connect." There is a better case to be made that open-jaw itineraries operated by foreign carriers are always illegal, regardless of duration, than there is a case to be made that having a quick meeting in Toronto makes your example legal. In practice, the DOT seems to have taken the position that ~3 days is a sufficient length of time to make the trip legal.
True; I suppose the EU common market is an outlier. But if you treat the EU as a single entity, then it still holds -- UA can't operate FRA-MUC without permission. :)
Is there some reference for this? I have had a several one-day trips US-Canada-US and never really gave it much thought. I do actually have something to do in Canada on those trips, but my take from what you're saying is that doesn't matter. So if there's a magic number of days for "legal", I guess I'd need to watch out for doing those on all AC metal, for example?
paperwastage | Oct 24, 2023 10:04 am |
Originally Posted by jsloan(Post 35690325)
What's an "invalid booking," though?
I suspect the response would be, "tough cookies, connect." There is a better case to be made that open-jaw itineraries operated by foreign carriers are always illegal, regardless of duration, than there is a case to be made that having a quick meeting in Toronto makes your example legal. In practice, the DOT seems to have taken the position that ~3 days is a sufficient length of time to make the trip legal.
. :)
3-4 day for TPAC to Guam/Saipan.
In the past, AC configured their websute to alert for 4 hour at the search results level , but I don't see it anymore now. Their engine allows LAX-YYZ-EWR with 3 hour layover, but I haven't gone thru to final page to see if there's a warning
https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/35141984-post22.html
UA 's website, as far as I can tell, doesnt give you same-day all AC metal (only UA metal options for the second leg), but does if you try next day
Repooc17 | Oct 24, 2023 10:06 am |
Originally Posted by jsloan(Post 35690325)
What's an "invalid booking," though?
Invalid booking = cabotage itinerary. As in AC, for example, roots out any potential cabotage itinerary at booking.
jsloan | Oct 24, 2023 11:50 am |
Originally Posted by Repooc17(Post 35690377)
Invalid booking = cabotage itinerary. As in AC, for example, roots out any potential cabotage itinerary at booking.
But that's the thing. The law doesn't specify what constitutes an exception to illegal cabotage. It seems obvious to us that if you fly a foreign airline from LAX overseas, and then return 11 months later to SNA, you took two trips; the law is less clear.
Now, the DOT is using common sense and isn't trying to prosecute 11-month stays. But it's up to each airline's lawyers to decide what they're comfortable with. It seems, from the examples posted on this thread, that UA and AC differ. However, AC reserves the absolute right to deny OP transport if they feel the trip constitutes illegal cabotage, even on separate tickets, or even if UA sold it to them. That's why I maintain that this is a question for the AC forum, but also that the issue could be clearly avoided if OP flew AS from SEA to YVR.
Sidharth2008 | Mar 14, 2024 11:52 am |
Flight from EWR to LAX via Toronto on Air Canada.
I cant find any united award availability going from EWR-LAX as united is very stingy with their award program. However there are plenty of option going though Toronto, so I can take a positioning flight from New York to Toronto to LAX. I want to book this via either United or Avinca but I want this under one iternary so I dont have double the rates ie (33k miles instead of 33k miles+20k miles). Should I call united to make this booking?
Thank you!
gabrielz | Mar 14, 2024 11:55 am |
Cabotage
Howdy. You cannot book a domestic flight through a second country. This is called cabotage. If you want to do what you propose youll need to book two separate itineraries.
-G
PbodyPhoto | Mar 14, 2024 11:56 am |
google cabotage.
skunker | Mar 14, 2024 12:17 pm |
Originally Posted by gabrielz(Post 36080227)
Howdy. You cannot book a domestic flight through a second country. This is called cabotage. If you want to do what you propose youll need to book two separate itineraries.
-G
You can fly through a second country, that's not the problem. The problem is the foreign carrier. OP can avoid cabotage by having a 24+ hour stopover in Toronto.
Repooc17 | Mar 14, 2024 12:54 pm |
If you are finding good award options on YYZ-LAX, you can do one of two things:
1) Buy a separate ticket from EWR-YYZ on operated by UA, and leave sufficient time in between.
2) Buy a separate ticket from EWR-YYZ operated by AC, leave sufficient time in between, and hope AC don't cancel. AC also has flights from LGA and JFK.
AC is not going to sell you a (one) ticket between NY and LA, connecting in Toronto. Non-US carriers are subject to US cabotage rules.
Kacee | Mar 14, 2024 1:13 pm |
I don't know how diligent AC is about checking, but some carriers will cancel that itinerary even if booked on separate tix because of the cabotage issue. OZ got hit with a pretty hefty fine several years ago (it was actively promoting the illegal connection).
I would be looking at different ways to get from LAX to NYC, including other carriers. AA generally has much better award prices than UA.
gabrielz | Mar 14, 2024 2:38 pm |
Originally Posted by skunker(Post 36080281)
You can fly through a second country, that's not the problem. The problem is the foreign carrier. OP can avoid cabotage by having a 24+ hour stopover in Toronto.
Absolutely, positively, 1000% inaccurate.
This is not allowed, even with a stopover. If the fare constructed is USXXX -- Canada -- USXXX, it is illegal. The operating airline will be fined.
Air Canada also will not allow a stopover in this region, so you can forget about it - and US carriers won't sell this at all.
I think you'd struggle to construct such a ticket EVEN in revenue systems.
If the tickets are EWR-YYZ and then YYZ-LAX on two separate ticket numbers, they are unlikely to be problematic (despite others' comments here).
Also the whole thing is just stupid. With the huge plethora of 1 stop connex between NYC and LAX within the US, going via Canada is just ASKING for it.
-G
WineCountryUA | Mar 14, 2024 2:42 pm |
Originally Posted by gabrielz(Post 36080694)
... This is not allowed, even with a stopover. If the fare constructed is USXXX -- Canada -- USXXX, it is illegal. The operating airline will be fined.....
Not if one segment is flown by a USA flagged carrier. Who tickets is of no consequences.
Kacee | Mar 14, 2024 4:01 pm |
Originally Posted by gabrielz(Post 36080694)
If the tickets are EWR-YYZ and then YYZ-LAX on two separate ticket numbers, they are unlikely to be problematic (despite others' comments here).
This is not accurate. The analysis is more nuanced. For anyone who's interested in DOT's reasoning and guidance, including examples of situations that that are or are not likely to give rise to enforcement action, you can read DOT's Order here: https://www.transportation.gov/sites...2002-10-20.pdf
oblisk | Apr 4, 2024 6:00 am |
Was looking for some award travel for my in-laws, got an odd option that smells like cabotoge: FCO-ORD-YYZ-LGA (UA-AC-AC), maybe originating EU exempts it but feels like its something that probably shouldn't happen.
Spoiler
cfischer | Apr 4, 2024 6:03 am |
Originally Posted by oblisk(Post 36134852)
Was looking for some award travel for my in-laws, got an odd option that smells like cabotoge: FCO-ORD-YYZ-LGA (UA-AC-AC), maybe originating EU exempts it but feels like its something that probably shouldn't happen.
Spoiler
That routing is not a problem. You are not allowed to book US to US via Canada. Italy to US vis US/CA is not a problem
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 1:07 pm. | Page 7 of 7 < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page |
This site is owned, operated, and maintained by MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Designated trademarks are the property of their respective owners.