Print Thread | Hop To |
![]() 06/11/24 05:41 PM06/11/24 05:41 PM | |
Joined: Mar 2013 Posts: 119 Northern CA R ![]() trapper | |
Robert Martin![]() trapper R Joined: Mar 2013 Posts: 119 Northern CA | Does anyone have any experience using these bullets on game? https:/ fixed the link I think... I'm thinking of ordering a box of the 101 grain bullets to load for my 25-06. It seems to have the best ballistic coefficient I can find for a California approved lead free bullet. I'm using the 115 grain TSX bullets now, I do like the idea of the heavier bullet... BUT the faster 101 grain bullet will drop 4.5 inches less at 500 yards, and have 70 ft.-pounds more energy at 500 yards. If the bullet performance on game is good, it would be worth me trying them out to see how they shoot. Last edited by Robert Martin; Yesterday at 10:53 AM. Reason: fixing the link to the bullets... Robert Martin |
![]() 06/11/24 05:51 PM06/11/24 05:51 PM | |
Joined: Jul 2013 Posts: 12,217 Amite county Mississippi Wolfdog91 ![]() trapper | |
Wolfdog91![]() trapper Joined: Jul 2013 Posts: 12,217 Amite county Mississippi | Id ask ridge runner , Boone or sneaky, there the long range gurus on here |
![]() 06/11/24 05:57 PM06/11/24 05:57 PM | |
Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 42,547 Northern Maine Bruce T ![]() trapper | |
Bruce T![]() trapper Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 42,547 Northern Maine | Barnes are great hunting bullets Nevada bound |
![]() 06/11/24 06:05 PM06/11/24 06:05 PM | |
Joined: Jan 2017 Posts: 10,332 Marion Kansas Y ![]() "Callie's little brother" | |
Yes sir![]() "Callie's little brother" Y Joined: Jan 2017 Posts: 10,332 Marion Kansas |
|
![]() 06/12/24 05:54 AM06/12/24 05:54 AM | |
Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 3,927 eastern WV R ![]() trapper | |
Ridge Runner1960![]() trapper R Joined: Dec 2008 Posts: 3,927 eastern WV | If I were gonna go solid copper,, would try Hammer bullets first, read many, many good reports on them from very knowledgeable shooters. |
![]() 06/12/24 07:12 AM06/12/24 07:12 AM | |
Joined: Jul 2016 Posts: 933 SD T ![]() trapper | |
TC1![]() trapper T Joined: Jul 2016 Posts: 933 SD | Now heres the real question. Will you be shooting any deer at 500+ yards? Is your equipment up to it, and are you up to it? Not inferring you are not, just asking that question. If the terrain you hunt and you and your equipment are up to it maybe worth changing. But if your shooting anywhere less than that distance the virtual minuscule difference in bullet drop would make it hard for me to change from a proven winner.. I love the TSX & TTSX btw. Long live the MAGA King |
![]() 06/12/24 11:31 AM06/12/24 11:31 AM | |
Joined: Jan 2016 Posts: 1,101 East Central Wi. coyote addict ![]() trapper | |
coyote addict![]() trapper Joined: Jan 2016 Posts: 1,101 East Central Wi. |
Member -W.T.A. N.T.A. - N.R. A. |
![]() 06/12/24 11:39 AM06/12/24 11:39 AM | |
Joined: Sep 2023 Posts: 326 MO C ![]() trapper | |
Crappiekiller![]() trapper C Joined: Sep 2023 Posts: 326 MO | I have used the TSX/TTSX/LRX in multiple chamberings. 6mm/257/6.5/7mm/308/8mm. All have performed very well. I did catch a TTSX from a 264 WM in a bedded buck. Bullet impacted just in front of the front shoulder as the deer was facing me at a slight angle. Bullet was found on the off ham, retained over 80% of original weight. CK |
![]() 06/12/24 04:09 PM06/12/24 04:09 PM | |
Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 9,310 Alaska and Washington State W ![]() trapper | |
waggler![]() trapper W Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 9,310 Alaska and Washington State | In the past, the problem with most solid copper bullets and "long range" is that once the velocity drops below about 1800 fps, they fail to expand very well. It sounds like Barnes may have remedied this with the LRX bullet; interesting. "My life is better than your vacation" |
![]() Yesterday at 10:46 AMYesterday at 10:46 AM | |
Joined: Mar 2013 Posts: 119 Northern CA R ![]() trapper | |
Robert Martin![]() trapper R Joined: Mar 2013 Posts: 119 Northern CA | Originally Posted by TC1 Now heres the real question. Will you be shooting any deer at 500+ yards? Is your equipment up to it, and are you up to it? Not inferring you are not, just asking that question. If the terrain you hunt and you and your equipment are up to it maybe worth changing. But if your shooting anywhere less than that distance the virtual minuscule difference in bullet drop would make it hard for me to change from a proven winner.. I love the TSX & TTSX btw. I have killed bucks just over 500 yards, and 400 yards is quit common. There are very few deer around here any more, and a lot of the country is wide open. If you can't shoot 400 ~ 500 yards you are going to miss a lot of opportunity. Same with coyotes, but those guys are a very small target at 500 yards! Robert Martin |
![]() Yesterday at 10:53 AMYesterday at 10:53 AM | |
Joined: Mar 2013 Posts: 119 Northern CA R ![]() trapper | |
Robert Martin![]() trapper R Joined: Mar 2013 Posts: 119 Northern CA | Originally Posted by Yes sir I've shot a few deer with them. They shoot very well for a hunting bullet, usually the best or second best out of the different hunting bullets I've tried in my guns. They performed well on deer but it doesn't take much of a bullet to harvest a deer. My understanding after doing quite a bit of research the LRXs might be a bit more fragile in the nose section and might shear a petal off a bit easier than the TTSXs but I'm not too concerned with that as some makers actually design their bullets to break the pedals off, they believe it providers better terminal performance..??? The shank is going to hold together and punch through either way Thanks Yes sir, there was only 5 reviews on midway, and it looked like only 1 review actually tried them on deer. He said the did not expand at all, .25 cal. hole going in, and a .25 cal. hole going out, with little to no blood trail. I guess I'll chalk that up to an anomaly? For California legal bullets they are somewhat reasonable priced, so I guess I better try them. Robert Martin |
![]() Yesterday at 11:02 AMYesterday at 11:02 AM | |
Joined: Mar 2013 Posts: 119 Northern CA R ![]() trapper | |
Robert Martin![]() trapper R Joined: Mar 2013 Posts: 119 Northern CA | Originally Posted by Ridge Runner1960 If I were gonna go solid copper,, would try Hammer bullets first, read many, many good reports on them from very knowledgeable shooters. A lot of guys I know are using the Hammer bullets, they say they shoot great, I'm not sure how they do on game... BUT they are NOT recommended for rifles with a slower twist rate. My rifle is an old Savage model 110, (bought it when I was 14), it's a little beat up, but is still shoots good. I don't know the twist rate, but they tell me it is likely slow. But I'm going to ride the old savage horse as long as I can. I'm just trying to get her California legal. Long story short, all the guys shooting Hammer bullets say they may not work in my rifle. Robert Martin |
![]() Yesterday at 11:20 AMYesterday at 11:20 AM | |
Joined: Jan 2017 Posts: 10,332 Marion Kansas Y ![]() "Callie's little brother" | |
Yes sir![]() "Callie's little brother" Y Joined: Jan 2017 Posts: 10,332 Marion Kansas | Originally Posted by Robert Martin Originally Posted by Yes sir I've shot a few deer with them. They shoot very well for a hunting bullet, usually the best or second best out of the different hunting bullets I've tried in my guns. They performed well on deer but it doesn't take much of a bullet to harvest a deer. My understanding after doing quite a bit of research the LRXs might be a bit more fragile in the nose section and might shear a petal off a bit easier than the TTSXs but I'm not too concerned with that as some makers actually design their bullets to break the pedals off, they believe it providers better terminal performance..??? The shank is going to hold together and punch through either way Thanks Yes sir, there was only 5 reviews on midway, and it looked like only 1 review actually tried them on deer. He said the did not expand at all, .25 cal. hole going in, and a .25 cal. hole going out, with little to no blood trail. I guess I'll chalk that up to an anomaly? For California legal bullets they are somewhat reasonable priced, so I guess I better try them. The .25 hole in and .25 hole out might be possible if shot at close range and really high velocity where there's a possibility of shearing all the petals off which is what the hammer bullet is designed to do and supposed kills very well. And if the shot was high lungs the bleeding could of just been filling up the lungs and/or the heart just stopped pumping blood immediately resulting in less blood. If this was the case I'm guessing the terminal performance was adequate enough no trailing was done.worked kind of like a fragmenting bullet but the shank stayed together and did exit. |
Previous Thread | Index | Next Thread |
Moderated by 330-Trapper, Bogmaster, Cindy, cotton, Drifter, Maddog47, Paul Dobbins, USMC47 🦫, Wolfdog91